Our algorithms have come a long way. Sniper 2.0 and Explorer earn more on every dollar wagered, turn modest daily volume into real profit, and reduce losing stretches.
Methodology
Benchmarks use paper-traded algorithm results, actual historical trends, and 30-day simulations to compare Sniper 2.0, Explorer, and the Initial baseline across ROI, monthly profit, available bet volume, and probability of a profitable month.
The benchmark page models a $50 average bet size, selected bets-per-day volumes, and 30-day outcomes. Confidence ranges use simulated p10 and p90 outcomes, with the Initial baseline widened to reflect higher empirical variance from that era.
No. The benchmarks are estimates from historical paper-trading and simulation data. Actual results can vary based on sportsbook availability, execution speed, limits, slippage, bet sizing, and market conditions.